Thread:PoseidonHeir/@comment-32833634-20200121155506/@comment-35578328-20200122053217

While other senators may not agree with this, I think surreal religions with a history of violence or untrustworthiness (largely seperatist orangists) should be allowed, as long as the user that's a part of it isn't actively committing crimes. This may sound a bit illogical, but either in theory there could be users like seperatist orangists who haven't done many untrustworthy actions themselves. However, this freedom would end as soon as these supporters of violent religions actually do bad things.

Besides, surreal religion literally doesn't exist anymore. It's been months since the labels "Orangist" and "Mememanist" have been really used, and even longer since they've actually meant something. They were really only important in the days before the adoption, the days of IRONIC and the genuinely destructive orangists. My point is, that if these religions don't even exist anymore, we might as well give all of them the freedom to exist and expand, so long as they don't violate the rights of other users or the peace and order of the wiki. I don't think this is an especially dangerous liberty to grant as long as we make it clear that trolling, harassment, and destruction are as banned as before. Here is my idea for an amendment to the surrealstitution, under rights of the people, freedom of religion:

"All users have the right to practice whichever religion they want, even if this religion has a known history of destruction or distrust on the wiki. This includes religions such as seperatist orangism. However, users may not force their religion upon other users in any way. They may also not harass another user based on religion, or if they are in the wiki government, treat users under their control based on religion.