Thread:PoseidonHeir/@comment-32833634-20200121155506/@comment-35578328-20200124204041

Let's take your example of neonazis before, even if it's a bit edgy. There's a difference between actual nazis who have actually committed horrible atrocities, and neonazis, who may be insane but still haven't committed atrocities like those they claim to agree with. Now, if these neonazis, who are still different from actual nazis, manage to express their beliefs peacefully (which is to be fair almost impossible with fascism), freedom of speech should protect their beliefs as long as they don't harass minorities or do other awful things.

So if a user claims to be a seperatist-orangist, but doesn't actually vandalize or do bad things to the wiki, shouldn't they have a right to express their beliefs peacefully, if they manage to? I mean, there's a difference with saying "Meme Man is bad" and "I hate Mememanists".